In light of Speaker Pelosi’s recent changes to the House Rules, it seems clear that the Congressional Democratic leadership has no desire to work on bi-partisan solutions to real issues. They would rather push their ultra liberal, big-government agenda and force more problems on American taxpayers.
The $10 Billion (until it’s loaded up with even more pork barrel spending) Omnibus bill is a compilation of over one hundred land-grab bills that would forever subjugate nearly one million acres to permanent federal government control and beyond the reach of anyone who wants to use it for purchase, hunting, biking, energy exploration, farming and anything else. Emboldened by a new, overwhelming Democratic majority, Senator Reid will stop at nothing to pass this shameless legislation that ignores hundreds of years of common law property rights.
The Federal Government already owns over 650 million acres of land, many of which are simply designated as “wilderness,” and many more that are kept in neglect. Since when have Americans been prohibited from inhabiting the “wilderness?” That lifestyle is a big part of our history and heritage but big city liberals don’t care. They would rather conceal their true intentions of ultimate government control beneath the rhetoric of “environmentalism.” If this is their true intention, why do they want to waste more money on acquiring new land when they aren’t even keeping up the land they already own?
Quick action is needed to stop this bill in its tracks – cloture vote is this Sunday. For more information, a 111-member coalition letter opposing the bill can be viewed at http://www.propertyrightsalliance.org/images/File/110608lt_coalition.pdf.
2 comments:
Dear Congressmen and women:
As the new year begins, I find it critical at this time to express our concerns regarding the “Paleontological Resources Preservation Act” that is currently under consideration by the House. Unfortunately, this passed through the Senate as a part of the incredibly huge Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009. I find it disconcerting that this bill is continuing to make its way through the legislative system with all of its problems still attached.
The AAPS (Association of Applied Paleontological Sciences) board of directors has reviewed House Bill HR 554, “Paleontological Resources Preservation Act” and S.22 “Paleontological Resources Preservation.” There are many good things about this bill in both forms, but also many issues that need to be addressed that affect not only commercial collectors, like Triebold Paleontology, but many academic and scientific institutions as well. We appreciate you taking the time to review this information and how it will affect all of us in the paleontology industry, commercial, academic and amateur.
The following points are reasons why AAPS cannot support this Bill (using S.22 data) and urge you to vote NO on the upcoming Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 with Subtitle D included:
Sec. 6302 (a) states that “the Secretary shall manage and protect Paleontological resources on Federal lands using scientific principles and expertise.” This is exactly what many professional companies, like TPI, have to offer. We applaud the Bill’s recognition that the Secretary of the Interior has the responsibility to manage and protect paleontological resources on public lands. After so many years of changing policy, this Bill would finally clarify regulation of fossil collecting, and increase public awareness. We are in complete support of the casual collecting exemption. Amateurs are the foot soldiers of paleontology and their activities are to be encouraged. We applaud the recognition that all qualified individuals will be eligible to obtain a permit. In past bills, commercial and amateur collectors were not allowed to obtain permits.
Sec. 6304 (c) 3 states that “specific locality data will not be released by the permittee or repository without the written permission of the Secretary.” It is against scientific principles to keep scientific data secret. This should be available to all scientists and the general public who own public lands. Except in only the most special circumstance locality data should not be withheld. Science and the public want to know this information.
Sec. 6306 (b) states that “a person may not make or submit any false record, account, or label for, or any false identification of, any paleontological resource excavated or removed from Federal land.” Ironically, Paleontology is a field that is not set in stone. What you find and label in the field may not be what you find as preparation is undertaken in the lab. Penalties for misidentification of fossils will place every museum in jeopardy. There is not one museum that is free from labeling errors on specimens on exhibit or in collections.
Sec 6303 (c) states that penalties “such person shall be fined in accordance with title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both” is quite extreme punishment for mislabeling a fossil. We could find a large number of our scientists and museum curators behind bars if this was actually enforced. And heavens! With (d) if you mislabel more than two times, your penalty could be doubled! I guess this would be one way for starving scientists to get a free meal…
Sec. 6307 (a) 2 (A) states “the scientific or fair market value, whichever is greater, of Paleontological resource involved.” There is no logical scientific or empirical way to assign a dollar amount to scientific value. Only the term fair market value should be used. The market adequately determines the value of a Paleontological specimen.
Sec. 6308 (b) states that “all vehicles and equipment of any person that were used in connection with the violation, shall be subject to civil forfeiture, or upon conviction, to criminal forfeiture.” Imprisonment and vehicle forfeiture should be reserved for only the most heinous violations. Our government does not need to put scientists in jail and confiscate University vans. We can visualize now a group of students unknowingly crossing over an invisible line and ending up handcuffed and prosecuted. An honest mistake is just that and should be treated accordingly.
There are no provisions for the sale of fossils from commercial quarries or surface collecting. These are an important and integral part of the world of paleontology, and a mechanism to provide for the sale of fossils from public lands, like other resources, should have been devised as part of this Bill. There are also no provisions for commercial exploration, collecting, processing and sale of fossils on public lands. Wouldn’t this be a better alternative than fossils disappearing from the world forever? All other natural resources are allowed this application. Why have vertebrate fossils been excluded? Gravel companies can grind up fossils for fill, but collectors are not allowed to collect and sell these same fossils. Something just doesn’t seem right about this.
AAPS members have volunteered numerous times to assist with the wording of this Bill and to date have been largely ignored. As the only organization of professional fossil collectors in the US, we find it disturbing that the issues we might have helped deal with in the creation of this legislation, and those which unfortunately require that we withhold our support, could have been successfully addressed had we been consulted. We invite you to visit our facility here in Woodland Park to see first hand how a commercial Paleontological company does business and pays its own way. Please extend this invitation to other members of the committee. I feel that they probably don’t really know what we do, how we do it, and the responsibility we have to science and our field of choice, paleontology.
Professional collectors, intimately familiar with the latest techniques for safe retrieval and documentation can and should be a vital ally in the fight to preserve our fossil resources. Myriad opportunities exist for contract and collaborative exploration, excavation, preparation, molding, casting, mounting and conservation. Due to the expense involved with fossil collecting, many specimens have been lost to science due to the fact that the museums and universities collecting on public land do not have the time, money or staff to collect everything they see. These specimens end up as dust as they erode away. Representatives from different museums and organizations have told us of this exact thing happening to them, as year after year they return to a collecting area and watch fossils erode to nothing.
It is also important to note that our arguments against this legislation are supported by the National Academy of Sciences 1986 report titled “Paleontological Collecting”.
Unfortunately, years later and following numerous requests to participate in the process, we still have not had an opportunity to provide additional insight into this Bill. Perhaps with a little more input and a few amendments, this Bill could really benefit the science of paleontology. Please allow us an opportunity to participate in the creation of viable legislation that would preserve the resource and bring all of paleontology together. DO NOT allow this legislation to pass in its present form.
Sincerely,
Tracie Bennitt
President, Association of Applied Paleontological Sciences
tracie@trieboldpaleontology.com
Great article as for me. It would be great to read a bit more concerning that topic.
By the way check the design I've made myself Companionship in London
Post a Comment